Do animals possess moral rights

The question as to whether animals possess moral rights has triggered a fierce debate ever since the Darwinian ages. Critics such as Tom Regan have criticized the use of animals in human research and experiments on grounds that it violates the moral rights of animals.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Do animals possess moral rights? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More However, such arguments have been challenged by another side of moral philosophy that argues that non-human animals lack moral worth, and therefore, cannot demand any moral obligation towards them. These arguments can only be addressed to a satisfactory level by analyzing the aspects of humans that elevates humanity to a higher moral status that supersedes that of other animals. Carl Cohen argues that animals cannot be given the same moral considerations because they lack independent moral will, and therefore, they cannot claim moral rights. Cohen, howe ver, disputes that, animals’ lack of rights cannot be used by humans to alleviate themselves some obligation to animals because obligation is not necessarily based on a right. To say that an animal should be given moral consideration signifies that those who recognize moral claims have a duty to reciprocate the same to other beings that share the same qualities. The main question that arises out of this argument is that, can animals be wronged in any way that can be said to be morally relevant? It is widely believed that only humans possess emotions and are, therefore, the only beings that can make claims on any moral grounds. Those such as Cohen who argue against animal rights, base their arguments largely on the perceived none sentient nature of non-human animals. Cohen concludes that because animals do not have the ability to comprehend the rules of moral duty and cannot exercise claims against others, they do not have any moral rights. Accepting the claims presented by Co hen would mean a justification for humanity to subject animals to acts that cause suffering, discomfort, pain, and even death. Opposing these views is Tom Regan who presents a radical egalitarian argument for animal rights. He argues that animals that are exploited by humans for various uses have a life of their own that plays some importance to them other than just being resources for human beings. They have a sense of their environment and they have individual, biological, and social needs, which when violated, subject them to pain or deprive them of pleasure. Regan holds the view that it is fundamentally wrong for humans to use animals for food, experiments, research, and in any other way that treats animals as resources.Advertising Looking for essay on ethics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Regan’s views are quite radical, while Cohen’s argument that moral rights can only be claimed by those who recognize th em and can understand the related rules is inadequate. This means that even those humans who are unable to comprehend moral contracts, for example, mentally unstable persons, cannot claim moral rights, and other humans similarly do not have a moral duty towards them. Cohen fails to address this challenge. It is also unfounded to argue that animals do not feel pain or pleasure. Because humans do not understand how some animals express their emotions is not qualified to justify the argument that such animals lack emotions. Humans are very different in a variety of ways from other animals, as well as within themselves as a species. However, these differences cannot be used as a philosophical defense to deny moral consideration to non-human animals. Humans have a duty to treat other animals with respect and dignity because duties are not necessarily based on moral right. This essay on Do animals possess moral rights? was written and submitted by user Ultra-Adaptoid to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Personal Music Statement essays

Personal Music Statement essays As a future teacher I feel that music is an important subject to incorporate in the everyday classroom. I have not experienced any form of music class since I was in elementary school and I feel that it is very important for students at a younger age. When I was a young child I can remember almost everything we did in music class everyday and that is because of the impact my music teacher had on me. He was the most outgoing teacher I ever had throughout my school years and he made music entertaining and exciting for his students. Many children did not like to go to music because they found it boring, but I loved to get out of the classroom and go to music class because it was such an enjoyable experience. We did many unique activities involving music and instruments and I think that it is very important to allow young children to have unique experiences with a variety of subjects. When I was in middle school I joined the marching band, but I was not part of the instrumental section. I was in the flag corps and I absolutely loved being part of the band. Although I was not producing sound with an instrument I was involved with the beat of the instruments and I learned a lot about music in my middle school years. As I approached high school I decided to continue with the flag corps and when I was a junior I became the captain. I made all the routines for the songs the marching band played so I have had a lot of experience with learning beats and trying to put movements to them. It seemed very difficult at times to match a routine to the song, but as the years past it became much easier. I am not involved with the flag corps or marching band anymore, but I do listen to music quite a bit in my spare time. When I am in my room at school studying, reading, or just playing on the computer, I always have the radio on. I would much rather listen to music then watch television. I could listen to any ki ...